„Starved for affection, terrified of abandonment, I began to wonder if sex was really just an excuse to look deeply into another human being's eyes.“

—  Douglas Coupland, kniha Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture

Generation X (1991)
Zdroj: Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture

Poslední aktualizace 22. května 2020. Historie

Podobné citáty

Peter Akinola foto

„The victimisation or diminishment of human beings whose affections happen to be ordered towards people of the same sex is anathema to us.“

—  Peter Akinola Anglican Primate of the Church of Nigeria 1944

Statement of the Primates of the Anglican Communion at Dromantine, February 2005
Associated quotations

Xaviera Hollander foto
William Lloyd Garrison foto
Tony Banks foto

„She behaves with all the sensitivity of a sex-starved boa constrictor“

—  Tony Banks British politician 1942 - 2006

Tony Banks close to death after stroke, The Independent (online edition), Sophie Goodchild, 2006-01-08 http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article337229.ece, http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,1682818,00.html
on former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher

Ann Coulter foto
Morrissey foto
Sarah Maple foto

„It's just a penis, it's just a bit of flesh, just this one organ, people think makes you superior to another sex.“

—  Sarah Maple British artist 1985

"Sarah Maple interviewed by Anousha Nzume at the Women Inc. Festival" (5 March 2011) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4oXs_BzmUw

David Levithan foto
Kathleen Turner foto

„Being a sex symbol has to do with an attitude, not looks. Most men think it's looks, most women know otherwise.“

—  Kathleen Turner American actress 1954

As quoted in The Routledge Dictionary of Quotations (1987) by Robert Andrews, p. 241
Also quoted in The Observer London UK newspaper (28 December 1986)

Jennifer Beals foto
Bill Maher foto
Lisa Kudrow foto
Madhuri Dixit foto
Wilfred Thesiger foto
Fred Astaire foto
Richard Stallman foto

„Andrew Holland was prosecuted in the UK for possessing "extreme pornography", a term which appears to mean porn that judges and prosecutors consider shocking. He had received a video showing a tiger having sex with a woman, or at least apparently so.
He was found innocent because the video he received was a joke. I am glad he was not punished, but this law is nonetheless a threat to other people. If Mr Holland had had a serious video depicting a tiger having sex with a woman, he still would not deserve to go to prison. … I've read that male dolphins try to have sex with humans, and female apes solicit sex from humans. What is wrong with giving them what they want, if that's what turns you on, or even just to gratify them?
But this law is not concerned with protecting animals, since it does not care whether the animal really had sex, or really existed at all. It only panders to the prejudice of censors.
A parrot once had sex with me. I did not recognize the act as sex until it was explained to me afterward, but being stroked on the hand by his soft belly feathers was so pleasurable that I yearn for another chance. I have a photo of that act; should I go to prison for it?
Perhaps I am spared because this photo isn't "disgusting", but "disgusting" is a subjective matter; we must not imprison people merely because someone feels disgusted. I find the sight of wounds disgusting; fortunately surgeons do not. Maybe there is someone who considers it disgusting for a parrot to have sex with a human. Or for a dolphin or tiger to have sex with a human. So what? Others feel that all sex is disgusting. There are prejudiced people that want to ban all depiction of sex, and force all women to cover their faces. This law and the laws they want are the same in spirit.
Threatening people with death or injury is a very bad thing, but violence is no less bad for being nonsexual. Is it worse to shoot someone while stroking that person's genitals than to shoot someone from a few feet away? If I were going to be the victim, and I were invited to choose one or the other, I would choose whichever one gave me the best chance to escape.
Images of violence can be painful to see, but they are no better for being nonsexual. I saw images of gruesome bodily harm in the movie Pulp Fiction. I do not want to see anything like that again, sex or no sex. That is no reason to censor these works, and would still not be a reason even if most people reacted to them as I do.
Since the law doesn't care whether a real human was really threatened with harm, it is not really concerned about our safety from violence, any more than it is concerned with avoiding suffering for corpses or animals. It is only prejudice, taking a form that can ruin people's lives.“

—  Richard Stallman American software freedom activist, short story writer and computer programmer, founder of the GNU project 1953

"Extreme Pornography Law in the UK" (2010) http://stallman.org/articles/extreme.html
2010s

„Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Etiam egestas wisi a erat. Morbi imperdiet, mauris ac auctor dictum.“