Bernard Williams citáty

Bernard Arthur Owen Williams byl britský filozof, věnující se především etice a morální filozofii.

Byl profesorem filozofie v Cambridge a v Berkeley. Patřil k analytické filozofii, kloubil ji však s humanismem a odmítal scientismus a neodarwinistický redukcionismus. Snažil se vytvořit etickou teorii inspirovanou Friedrichem Nietzschem a odklánějící se od Kanta na straně jedné a utilitarismu na straně druhé. Wikipedia

✵ 21. září 1929 – 10. červen 2003  •  Další jména Bernard Arthur Owen Williams

Bernard Williams: 10 citátů0 lajků

Bernard Williams citáty a výroky

„Dříve či později všichni začneme citovat svoje matky.“

Bernard Williams

Bernard Williams: Citáty anglicky

“Deniers do not get their views just from simple mistakes about language and truth. Rather, they believe that there is something to worry about in important areas of our thought and in traditional interpretations of those areas; they sense that it has something to do with truth; and (no doubt driven by the familiar desire to say something at once hugely general, deeply important, and reassuringly simple) they extend their worry to the notion of truth itself.”

Help us translate this quote

Bernard Williams

Zdroj: Truth and Truthfulness (2002), p. 6

“A further turn is to be found in some "unmasking" accounts of natural science, which aim to show that its pretensions to deliver the truth are unfounded, because of social forces that control its activities. Unlike the case of history, these do not use truths of the same kind; they do not apply science to the criticism of science. They apply the social sciences, and typically depend on the remarkable assumption that the sociology of knowledge is in a better position to deliver truth about science than science is to deliver truth about the world.”

Help us translate this quote

Bernard Williams

Zdroj: Truth and Truthfulness (2002), p. 2

“Two currents of ideas are very prominent in modern thought and culture. On the one hand, there is an intense commitment to truthfulness--or, at any rate, a pervasive suspiciousness, a readiness against being fooled, an eagerness to see through appearances to the real structures and motives that lie behind them. Always familiar in politics, it stretches to historical understanding, to the social sciences, and even to interpretations of discoveries and research in the natural sciences.
Together with this demand for truthfulness, however, or (to put it less positively) this reflex against deceptiveness, there is an equally pervasive suspicion about truth itself: whether there is such a thing; if there is, whether it can be more than relative or subjective or something of that kind; altogether, whether we should bother about it, in carrying on our activities or in giving an account of them. These two things, the devotion to truthfulness and the suspicion directed to the idea of truth, are connected to one other. The desire for truthfulness drives a process of criticism which weakens the assurance that there is any secure or unqualifiedly stateable truth.”

Help us translate this quote

Bernard Williams

Zdroj: Truth and Truthfulness (2002), p. 1; Chapter 1: The problem

“Positivism … implies the double falsehood that no interpretation is needed, and that it is not needed because the story which the positivist writer tells, such as it is, is obvious. The story he or she tells is usually a bad one, and its being obvious only means that it is familiar.”

Help us translate this quote

Bernard Williams

Zdroj: Truth and Truthfulness (2002), p. 12

“As Roland Barthes said, those who do not re-read condemn themselves to reading the same story everywhere: "they recognize what they already think and know."”

Help us translate this quote

Bernard Williams

Zdroj: Truth and Truthfulness (2002), p. 12

“There continue to be complex debates about what Nietzsche understood truth to be. Quite certainly, he did not think, in pragmatist spirit, that beliefs are true if they serve our interests or welfare: we have just seen some of his repeated denials of this idea. The more recently fashionable view is that he was the first of the deniers, thinking that there is no such thing as truth, or that truth is what anyone thinks it is, or that it is a boring category that we can do without. This is also wrong, and more deeply so. Nietzsche did not think that the ideal of truthfulness went into retirement when its metaphysical origins were discovered, and he did not suppose, either, that truthfulness could be detached from a concern for the truth. Truthfulness as an ideal retains its power, and so far from his seeing truth as dispensable or malleable, his main question is how it can be made bearable.”

Help us translate this quote

Bernard Williams

Zdroj: Truth and Truthfulness (2002), p. 16

“If the passion for truthfulness is merely controlled and stilled without being satisfied, it will kill the activities it is supposed to support. This may be one of the reasons why, at the present time, the study of the humanities runs a risk of sliding from professional seriousness, through professionalization, to a finally disenchanted careerism.”

Help us translate this quote

Bernard Williams

Zdroj: Truth and Truthfulness (2002), p. 3

“Nietzsche … did not settle for a demure civic conversation in the style of Richard Rorty's ironist, or saunter off with the smug nod that registers a deconstructive job neatly done. He was aware that his own criticisms and exposures owed both their motivation and their effect to the spirit of truthfulness. His aim was to see how far the values of truth could be revalued, how they might be understood in a perspective quite different from the Platonic and Christian metaphysics which had provided their principal source in the West up to now.”

Help us translate this quote

Bernard Williams

Zdroj: Truth and Truthfulness (2002), p. 18

“Those who say that all historical accounts are ideological constructs (which is one version of the idea that there is really no historical truth) rely on some story which must itself claim historical truth. They show that supposedly "objective" historians have tendentiously told their stories from some particular perspective; they describe, for example, the biasses that have gone into constructing various histories of the United States. Such an account, as a particular piece of history, may very well be true, but truth is a virtue that is embarrassingly unhelpful to a critic who wants not just to unmask past historians of America but to tell us that at the end of the line there is no historical truth. It is remarkable how complacent some "deconstructive" histories are about the status of the history that they deploy themselves.”

Help us translate this quote

Bernard Williams

Zdroj: Truth and Truthfulness (2002), p. 2