Elizabeth Anscombe citáty

Elizabeth Anscombe foto
0   0

Elizabeth Anscombe

Datum narození: 18. březen 1919
Datum úmrtí: 5. leden 2001

Reklama

Profesorka Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret Anscombe , přechýleně Anscombová či Anscombeová, byla britská katolická filosofka, přední analytická filosofka 2. poloviny 20. století, profesorka filosofie na University of Cambridge . Známá byla jako Elizabeth Anscombe či G. E. M. Anscombe. Byla významnou osobností hnutí pro-life a katolické morální filosofie.

Se svým manželem, filosofem Peterem Geachem , měla sedm dětí: tři syny a čtyři dcery.

Podobní autoři

Edith Stein foto
Edith Stein2
židovsko-německá jeptiška, teoložka a filozofka
Graham Greene foto
Graham Greene45
anglický spisovatel, dramatik a literární kritik
Roman Cardal1
český filozof
Jan Patočka foto
Jan Patočka6
český esejista a filozof
Ludwig Wittgenstein foto
Ludwig Wittgenstein11
rakouský filozof
Willard Van Orman Quine foto
Willard Van Orman Quine1
americký filozof a logik
Jaroslav Durych foto
Jaroslav Durych7
český básník, dramatik, esejista, lékař, náboženský spiso...
Carl Gustav Jung foto
Carl Gustav Jung92
švýcarský psychiatr a psychoterapeut, který založil analy...
Alfred North Whitehead foto
Alfred North Whitehead15
anglický matematik a filozof
Hannah Arendt foto
Hannah Arendt6
židovsko-americká politická teoretička

Citáty Elizabeth Anscombe

„We ought absolutely not to give out a teaching which is flattering to the lucky, and irrelevant to the unhappy.“

—  G. E. M. Anscombe
Context: If a kind of love cannot be commanded, we can't build our moral theology of marriage on the presumption that it will be present. Its absence is sad, but this sadness exists, it is very common. We should avoid, I think, using the indicative mood for what is really a commandment like the Scout Law ("A Boy Scout is kind to animals" - it means a Boy Scout ought to be kind to animals). For if we hear: "a Christian couple grow in grace and love together" doesn't the question arise "supposing they don't?" It clears the air to substitute the bite of what is clearly a precept for the sweetness of a rosy picture. The command to a Christian couple is: "Grow in grace and love together." But a joint command can only be jointly obeyed. Suppose it isn't? Well, there remains the separate precept to each and in an irremediably unhappy marriage, one ought still to love the other, though not perhaps feeling the affection that cannot be commanded. Thus the notion of the "marriage debt" is a very necessary one, and it alone is realistic: because it makes no assumption as to the state of the affections. Looking at the rightness of the marriage act like this will help in another way. It will prevent us from assuming that the pleasant affection which exists between a happy and congenial pair is the fulfilment of the precept of love. (It may after all only be a complacent hiving off together in a narrow love.) We ought absolutely not to give out a teaching which is flattering to the lucky, and irrelevant to the unhappy. Looked at carefully, too, such teaching is altogether too rigorist in a new direction. People who are not quite happily married, not lucky in their married life, but nevertheless have a loyalty to the bond, are not, therefore, bound to abstain from intercourse.

Reklama

„Implicitly, lasciviousness is over and over again treated as hateful, even by those who would dislike such an explicit judgment on it. Just listen, witness the scurrility when it's hinted at; disgust when it's portrayed as the stuff of life; shame when it's exposed, the leer of complicity when it's approved. You don't get these attitudes with everybody all of the time; but you do get them with everybody.“

—  G. E. M. Anscombe
Context: The trouble about the Christian standard of chastity is that it isn't and never has been generally lived by; not that it would be profitless if it were. Quite the contrary: it would be colossally productive of earthly happiness. All the same it is a virtue, not like temperance in eating and drinking, not like honesty about property, for these have a purely utilitarian justification. But it, like the respect for life, is a supra-utilitarian value, connected with the substance of life, and this is what comes out in the perception that the life of lust is one in which we dishonour our bodies. Implicitly, lasciviousness is over and over again treated as hateful, even by those who would dislike such an explicit judgment on it. Just listen, witness the scurrility when it's hinted at; disgust when it's portrayed as the stuff of life; shame when it's exposed, the leer of complicity when it's approved. You don't get these attitudes with everybody all of the time; but you do get them with everybody. (It's much too hard work to keep up the façade of the Playboy philosophy, according to which all this is just an unfortunate mistake, to be replaced by healthy-minded wholehearted praise of sexual fun.)

„The command to a Christian couple is: "Grow in grace and love together."“

—  G. E. M. Anscombe
Context: If a kind of love cannot be commanded, we can't build our moral theology of marriage on the presumption that it will be present. Its absence is sad, but this sadness exists, it is very common. We should avoid, I think, using the indicative mood for what is really a commandment like the Scout Law ("A Boy Scout is kind to animals" - it means a Boy Scout ought to be kind to animals). For if we hear: "a Christian couple grow in grace and love together" doesn't the question arise "supposing they don't?" It clears the air to substitute the bite of what is clearly a precept for the sweetness of a rosy picture. The command to a Christian couple is: "Grow in grace and love together." But a joint command can only be jointly obeyed. Suppose it isn't? Well, there remains the separate precept to each and in an irremediably unhappy marriage, one ought still to love the other, though not perhaps feeling the affection that cannot be commanded. Thus the notion of the "marriage debt" is a very necessary one, and it alone is realistic: because it makes no assumption as to the state of the affections. Looking at the rightness of the marriage act like this will help in another way. It will prevent us from assuming that the pleasant affection which exists between a happy and congenial pair is the fulfilment of the precept of love. (It may after all only be a complacent hiving off together in a narrow love.) We ought absolutely not to give out a teaching which is flattering to the lucky, and irrelevant to the unhappy. Looked at carefully, too, such teaching is altogether too rigorist in a new direction. People who are not quite happily married, not lucky in their married life, but nevertheless have a loyalty to the bond, are not, therefore, bound to abstain from intercourse.

Reklama

Help us translate English quotes

Discover interesting quotes and translate them.

Translate quotes
Today's anniversary
Leonid Nikolajevič Andrejev foto
Leonid Nikolajevič Andrejev19
ruský dramatik, spisovatel a básník 1871 - 1919
 Avicenna foto
Avicenna23
středověký perský učenec, lékař a filozof 980 - 1037
Wolfgang Hildesheimer foto
Wolfgang Hildesheimer1
německý autor 1916 - 1991
Oswald von Nell-Breuning1
německý teolog 1890 - 1991
Dalších 50 dnešních výročí
Podobní autoři
Edith Stein foto
Edith Stein2
židovsko-německá jeptiška, teoložka a filozofka
Graham Greene foto
Graham Greene45
anglický spisovatel, dramatik a literární kritik
Roman Cardal1
český filozof
Jan Patočka foto
Jan Patočka6
český esejista a filozof
Ludwig Wittgenstein foto
Ludwig Wittgenstein11
rakouský filozof