Christopher Hitchens citáty

Christopher Hitchens foto
6   11

Christopher Hitchens

Datum narození: 13. duben 1949
Datum úmrtí: 15. prosinec 2011
Další jména: Christopher Eric Hitchens

Christopher Eric Hitchens byl anglicko-americký spisovatel a novinář, jehož kariéra trvala více než čtyři desetiletí. Byl sloupkařem a literárním kritikem pro The Atlantic, Vanity Fair, Slate, World Affairs, The Nation a Free Inquiry. Byl častým hostem talk show a přednáškových sálů a v roce 2005 byl zvolen za pátého nejvlivnějšího intelektuála v hlasování magazínů Prospect/Foreign Policy.

Byl známý pro svůj obdiv George Orwella, Thomase Paina a Thomase Jeffersona a pro kritiku matky Terezy, Billa Clintona, Hillary Clintonové a Henryho Kissingera. Pro svůj konfrontační styl se stal vychvalovanou i kontroverzní osobností. Jako politický pozorovatel, polemik a politický radikalista vydal v USA a Spojeném království několik levicově orientovaných publikací. Od zavedené politické levice se začal vymezovat v roce 1989 po „vlažné reakci“ evropské levice na udělení fatvy na Salmana Rushdieho Rúholláhem Chomejním. Teroristické útoky 11. září 2001 posílily jeho kritiku „fašismu s islámskou tváří“. Kvůli jeho podpoře války v Iráku ho někteří lidé začali označovat za neokonzervatistu, ale on tvrdil, že není „konzervativní v jakémkoli smyslu“.

Spolu s Richardem Dawkinsem, Samem Harrisem a Danielem Dennettem byl přední postavou nového ateismu a sám sebe popisoval jako antiteistu, který věří ve filosofické hodnoty osvícenství. Říkal, že člověk „může být ateistou a zároveň věřit, že víra v boha je správná“, ale že „antiteista je někdo, kdo si myslí, že pro takový předpoklad nejsou žádné důkazy.“ Také tvrdil, že myšlenka boha nebo nejvyšší bytosti je totalitní víra, která ničí individuální svobodu. O ateismu a povaze náboženství napsal v roce 2007 knihu Bůh není veliký.

13. dubna 2007, v den svých 58. narozenin, se stal občanem USA, ale své britské občanství si ponechal. Jeho poslední kniha Hitch-22: A Memoir byla publikována v červnu 2010. Ještě ten stejný měsíc se začal léčit z nově diagnostikované rakoviny jícnu, jejímž následkům nakonec 15. prosince 2011 podlehl.

Citáty Christopher Hitchens

„Jedním z důvodů, proč rád debatuji s věřícími, je, že nikdy nevíte, co řeknou příště.“

—  Christopher Hitchens
Source: HITCHENS, Christopher. Is there an afterlife?. [Diskuze se Samem Harrisem a rabíny Davidem Wolpem a Bradleym Artsonem Shavitem]. 15. 2. 2011. Videozáznam http://www.jewishtvnetwork.com/?bcpid=533363107&bctid=802338105001 (anglicky).

„That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.“

—  Christopher Hitchens, god is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything
2000s, 2003, Context: Forgotten were the elementary rules of logic, that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and that what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. Variant: "What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof." in "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." appears by itself in God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything (2007). Translation of the Latin phrase "Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.".

Help us translate English quotes

Discover interesting quotes and translate them.

Start translating

„If it is a plan or a design, the planner must be either very capricious - really toying with his creation; and/or very clumsy, very tinkering and fantastically wasteful - throw away 99.9% of what you've made; or very cruel and very callous; or just perhaps very indifferent“

—  Christopher Hitchens
2000s, 2009, Context: If this was the plan - was it made by someone who likes us? And if so, why have 99.9% of all the other species that have ever been created already died out? And part of what plan was that?; If it is a plan or a design, the planner must be either very capricious - really toying with his creation; and/or very clumsy, very tinkering and fantastically wasteful - throw away 99.9% of what you've made; or very cruel and very callous; or just perhaps very indifferent; or some combination of all the above. And so it's no good saying that He moves in mysterious ways, or that He has purposes that are opaque to us, because even that kind of evasion has to make itself predicate on the assumption that the person saying this knows more than I do about the supernatural, and I haven't yet met anyone who does have a private line to the creator, of the sort that would be required even to speculate about it. In other words, I haven't met anyone, in holy orders or out of it, who isn't also a primate. And neither have you. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVvJf9wTQXo "Does Religion Poison Everything?", Festival of Dangerous Ideas, October 2009.

„I haven't met anyone, in holy orders or out of it, who isn't also a primate. And neither have you.“

—  Christopher Hitchens
2000s, 2009, Context: If this was the plan - was it made by someone who likes us? And if so, why have 99.9% of all the other species that have ever been created already died out? And part of what plan was that?; If it is a plan or a design, the planner must be either very capricious - really toying with his creation; and/or very clumsy, very tinkering and fantastically wasteful - throw away 99.9% of what you've made; or very cruel and very callous; or just perhaps very indifferent; or some combination of all the above. And so it's no good saying that He moves in mysterious ways, or that He has purposes that are opaque to us, because even that kind of evasion has to make itself predicate on the assumption that the person saying this knows more than I do about the supernatural, and I haven't yet met anyone who does have a private line to the creator, of the sort that would be required even to speculate about it. In other words, I haven't met anyone, in holy orders or out of it, who isn't also a primate. And neither have you. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVvJf9wTQXo "Does Religion Poison Everything?", Festival of Dangerous Ideas, October 2009.

„What is it like to lie to children and tell them that they have an authority, that they must love and be terrified of it at the same time. What's that like? I want to know.“

—  Christopher Hitchens
2000s, 2007, Context: On our integrity, our basic integrity, knowing right from wrong and being able to choose a right action over a wrong one, I think one must repudiate the claim that one doesn't have this moral discrimination innately, that, no, it must come only from the agency of a celestial dictatorship which one must love and simultaneously fear. What is it like to lie to children and tell them that they have an authority, that they must love and be terrified of it at the same time. What's that like? I want to know. And that we don't have an innate sense of right and wrong, children don't have an innate sense of fairness and decency, which of course they do. What is it like? Christopher Hitchens vs. Alister McGrath, 11/10/2007 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xq-KiDdYvsY&t=15m17s

„I'll give you all the miracles and you'll still be left exactly where you are now, holding an empty sack.“

—  Christopher Hitchens
2010s, 2010, Context: I'll grant you that it would possible to track the pregnancy of the woman Mary who's mentioned about three times in the Bible and to show there was no male intervention in her life at all but yet she delivered herself of a healthy baby boy. I can say— I don't say that's impossible. Parthenogenesis is not completely unthinkable. It does not prove that his paternity is divine and it wouldn't prove that any of his moral teachings were thereby correct. Nor, if I was to see him executed one day and see him walking the streets the next, would that show that his father was God or his mother was a virgin or that his teachings were true, especially given the commonplace nature of resurrection at that time and place. After all, Lazarus was raised, never said a word about it. The was raised, didn't say a thing about what she'd been through. And the Gospels tell us that at the time of the crucifixion all the graves in Jerusalem opened and their occupants wandered around the streets to greet people. So it seems resurrection was something of a banality at the time. Not all of those people clearly were divinely conceived. So I'll give you all the miracles and you'll still be left exactly where you are now, holding an empty sack. "Does God Exist?" debate http://hitchensdebates.blogspot.com/2010/11/hitchens-vs-turek-vcu.html vs.

„A moment later, the same speaker is telling another listener of all the good things that monarchy is a 'force' for. These good things invariably turn out to be connected to power. They are things like 'stability', 'unity', 'national cohesion', 'continuity' and other things for which powerless people would find it difficult to be a force. Edmund Wilson would have had little trouble noticing, furthermore, that all the above good things are keywords for conservative and establishment values.“

—  Christopher Hitchens
1990s, The Monarchy: A Critique of Britain's Favourite Fetish, Context: The first False Issue one normally encounters is the claim that it has 'no real power'. One never quite knows what 'real' is intended to mean here, but the conventions of the False Issue lead one to guess that the word is doing duty for 'formal'. Thus is the red herring introduced. A moment later, the same speaker is telling another listener of all the good things that monarchy is a 'force' for. These good things invariably turn out to be connected to power. They are things like 'stability', 'unity', 'national cohesion', 'continuity' and other things for which powerless people would find it difficult to be a force. Edmund Wilson would have had little trouble noticing, furthermore, that all the above good things are keywords for conservative and establishment values.

„You either accept the principle of royal intervention or you don't. And if you don't, you always have the choice of an actual 'Commonwealth' - the beautiful and resonant name given by the English revolutionaries to the most forbidden passage of our history after the removal of the Stuarts.“

—  Christopher Hitchens
1990s, The Monarchy: A Critique of Britain's Favourite Fetish, Context: The evidence is that on 'Commonwealth' questions Her Majesty reserves a certain autonomy when it comes to the expression of an opinion. But you can't have it both ways. Queen Victoria used to browbeat poor Mr Gladstone most dreadfully when it came to overseas or, as they were then called, 'imperial' matters. Either this is proper or it isn't. You either accept the principle of royal intervention or you don't. And if you don't, you always have the choice of an actual 'Commonwealth' - the beautiful and resonant name given by the English revolutionaries to the most forbidden passage of our history after the removal of the Stuarts.

„If this was the plan - was it made by someone who likes us?“

—  Christopher Hitchens
2000s, 2009, Context: If this was the plan - was it made by someone who likes us? And if so, why have 99.9% of all the other species that have ever been created already died out? And part of what plan was that?; If it is a plan or a design, the planner must be either very capricious - really toying with his creation; and/or very clumsy, very tinkering and fantastically wasteful - throw away 99.9% of what you've made; or very cruel and very callous; or just perhaps very indifferent; or some combination of all the above. And so it's no good saying that He moves in mysterious ways, or that He has purposes that are opaque to us, because even that kind of evasion has to make itself predicate on the assumption that the person saying this knows more than I do about the supernatural, and I haven't yet met anyone who does have a private line to the creator, of the sort that would be required even to speculate about it. In other words, I haven't met anyone, in holy orders or out of it, who isn't also a primate. And neither have you. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVvJf9wTQXo "Does Religion Poison Everything?", Festival of Dangerous Ideas, October 2009.

„Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Etiam egestas wisi a erat. Morbi imperdiet, mauris ac auctor dictum.“

Podobní autoři

George Orwell foto
George Orwell92
anglický spisovatel a novinář
Henry Louis Mencken foto
Henry Louis Mencken28
americký novinář a spisovatel
Christopher Morley foto
Christopher Morley3
americký novinář, romanopisec, esejista a básník
Jack London foto
Jack London28
americký autor, novinář a sociální aktivista
Hunter S. Thompson foto
Hunter S. Thompson9
americký novinář a spisovatel
Edward Abbey foto
Edward Abbey1
americký autor a esejista
John Ronald Reuel Tolkien foto
John Ronald Reuel Tolkien57
britský filolog a spisovatel, autor Pána prstenů
John C. Maxwell foto
John C. Maxwell29
americký autor, reproduktor a pastor
Truman Capote foto
Truman Capote7
americký autor
Nino Salvaneschi foto
Nino Salvaneschi1
italský básník, spisovatel a novinář
Dnešní výročí
Buddha foto
Buddha44
nepálský duchovní učitel na jehož učení bylo založeno Buddh… -563 - -483 př. n. l.
Chris Kyle foto
Chris Kyle10
americký voják 1974 - 2013
Pablo Picasso foto
Pablo Picasso47
španělský malíř, sochař, grafik, keramik a scénograf 1881 - 1973
Wilhelm Von Humboldt foto
Wilhelm Von Humboldt13
pruský filosof, vládní funkcionář, diplomat a zakladatel un… 1767 - 1835
Dalších 70 dnešních výročí
Podobní autoři
George Orwell foto
George Orwell92
anglický spisovatel a novinář
Henry Louis Mencken foto
Henry Louis Mencken28
americký novinář a spisovatel
Christopher Morley foto
Christopher Morley3
americký novinář, romanopisec, esejista a básník
Jack London foto
Jack London28
americký autor, novinář a sociální aktivista
Hunter S. Thompson foto
Hunter S. Thompson9
americký novinář a spisovatel
x