Richard Dawkins citáty
strana 6
9 citátů o přírodním výběru, víře a podstatě života

Objevte hluboké citáty Richarda Dawkinse o přírodním výběru, víře, alternativní medicíně, ateismu a podstatě života. Seznamte se s jeho výjimečnými myšlenkami o našem světě.

Clinton Richard Dawkins je britský zoolog, etolog a biolog, který se proslavil jako popularizátor evoluční teorie a sociobiologie. Před odchodem do důchodu v roce 2008 byl profesorem na univerzitě v Oxfordu a nyní působí jako spisovatel. Jeho největším přínosem je zpopularizování teorie sobeckého genu, která stála u zrodu současného evolučního paradigmatu.

Dawkins se narodil ve Velké Británii a ve svých osmi letech se s rodinou přestěhoval do země. Studoval zoologii na Balliol College v Oxfordu, kde získal bakalářský titul. Poté se stal žákem Nobelovy ceny v oblasti etologie, Nikolaase Tinbergena a získal magisterský a doktorský titul. Přednášel na Kalifornské univerzitě v Berkeley a roku 1970 se vrátil na univerzitu v Oxfordu, kde vyučoval zoologii.

✵ 26. březen 1941
Richard Dawkins foto
Richard Dawkins: 331   citátů 33   lajků

Richard Dawkins nejznámější citáty

„Více mě zajímá, co pravda je, než to, co bych si přál, aby pravda byla.“

Zdroj: DAWKINS, Richard. In: Q&A [televizní pořad]. ABC Australia, 8.3.2010

„Všichni jsme ateisté ohledně většiny bohů, ve které kdy lidstvo věřilo. Někteří z nás jdou jednoduše o jednoho boha dále.“

Zdroj: [Dawkins, Richard, The God Delusion, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 2008, 463, 1, 9780618918249, anglicky]

„Existence Boha je hypotéza.“

Zdroj: [Hříbek, Tomáš, Zač mají být ateisté vděčni?, lidovky.cz, 2010-19-09, 2011-02-16, http://www.lidovky.cz/ln_noviny.asp?r=ln_noviny&c=A101009_000083_ln_noviny_sko]

Richard Dawkins: Citáty anglicky

“All the world's Muslims have fewer Nobel Prizes than Trinity College, Cambridge. They did great things in the Middle Ages, though.”

https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/365473573768400896 (8 August 2013)
Twitter

“It is often said, mainly by the 'no-contests', that although there is no positive evidence for the existence of God, nor is there evidence against his existence. So it is best to keep an open mind and be agnostic. At first sight that seems an unassailable position, at least in the weak sense of Pascal's wager. But on second thoughts it seems a cop-out, because the same could be said of Father Christmas and tooth fairies. There may be fairies at the bottom of the garden. There is no evidence for it, but you can't prove that there aren't any, so shouldn't we be agnostic with respect to fairies?”

From speech at the Edinburgh International Science Festival, . Frequently misattributed to The God Delusion.
quoted in [EDITORIAL: A scientist's case against God, The Independent (London), April 20, 1992, 17] and [2011-05-27, What Should I Believe?: Philosophical Essays for Critical Thinking, Paul Gomberg, Broadview Press, 9781554810130, 146, http://books.google.com/books?id=76WxxHN9I0kC&pg=PA146&dq=%22Faith+is+the+great+cop-out%22]

“I'm not clever enough to be a physicist.”

When asked about why he chose to become a biologist. UR Samtiden - Verklighetens magi http://urplay.se/172258 2012-10-27.

“Suggest always put Islamic "scholar" in quotes, to avoid insulting true scholars. True scholars have read more than one book.”

https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/492729120418430976 (25 July 2014)
Twitter

“To an atheist […], there is no all-seeing all-loving god to keep us free from harm. But atheism is not a recipe for despair. I think the opposite. By disclaiming the idea of the next life, we can take more excitement in this one. The here and now is not something to be endured before eternal bliss or damnation. The here and now is all we have, an inspiration to make the most of it. So atheism is life-affirming, in a way religion can never be. Look around you. Nature demands our attention, begs us to explore, to question. Religion can provide only facile, ultimately unsatisfying answers. Science, in constantly seeking real explanations, reveals the true majesty of our world in all its complexity. People sometimes say "There must be more than just this world, than just this life". But how much more do you want? We are going to die, and that makes us the lucky ones. Most people are never going to die because they’re never going to be born. The number of people who could be here, in my place, outnumber the sand grains of Sahara. If you think about all the different ways in which our genes could be permuted, you and I are quite grotesquely lucky to be here, the number of events that had to happen in order for you to exist, in order for me to exist. We are privileged to be alive and we should make the most of our time on this world.”

End of the part 2: "The Virus of Faith" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMUG6qd98wc
The Root of All Evil? (January 2006)

“Islam needs a feminist revolution. It will be hard. What can we do to help?”

https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/624104581253963776 (22 July 2015)
Twitter

“It is grindingly, creakingly, crashingly obvious that, if Darwinism were really a theory of chance, it couldn't work.”

Richard Dawkins kniha Climbing Mount Improbable

Zdroj: Climbing Mount Improbable (2006), p.77

“Our ethics and our politics assume, largely without question or serious discussion, that the division between human and 'animal' is absolute. 'Pro-life', to take just one example, is a potent political badge, associated with a gamut of ethical issues such as opposition to abortion and euthanasia.
What it really means is pro-human-life. Abortion clinic bombers are not known for their veganism, nor do Roman Catholics show any particular reluctance to have their suffering pets 'put to sleep'. In the minds of many confused people, a single-celled human zygote, which has no nerves and cannot suffer, is infinitely sacred, simply because it is 'human'. No other cells enjoy this exalted status.
But such 'essentialism' is deeply un-evolutionary. If there were a heaven in which all the animals who ever lived could frolic, we would find an interbreeding continuum between every species and every other. For example I could interbreed with a female who could interbreed with a male who could… fill in a few gaps, probably not very many in this case… who could interbreed with a chimpanzee.
We could construct longer, but still unbroken chains of interbreeding individuals to connect a human with a warthog, a kangaroo, a catfish. This is not a matter of speculative conjecture; it necessarily follows from the fact of evolution.
A successful hybridisation between a human and a chimpanzee. Even if the hybrid were infertile like a mule, the shock waves that would be sent through society would be salutary. This is why a distinguished biologist described this possibility as the most immoral scientific experiment he could imagine: it would change everything! It cannot be ruled out as impossible, but it would be surprising.”

Richard Dawkins Chimpanzee Hybrid? The Guardian, Jan 2009 https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2009/jan/02/richard-dawkins-chimpanzee-hybrid?commentpage=2

“Imagine you are God. You’re all-powerful, nothing is beyond you. You’re all-loving. So it is really, really important to you that humans are left in no doubt about your existence and your loving nature, and exactly what they need to do in order to get to heaven and avoid eternity in the fires of hell. It’s really important to you to get that across. So what do you do? Well, if you’re Jehovah, apparently this is what you do. You talk in riddles. You tell stories which on the surface have a different message from the one you apparently want us to understand. You expect us to hear X, and instinctively understand that it needs to be interpreted in the light of Y, which you happen to have said in the course of a completely different story 500-1,000 years earlier. Instead of speaking directly into our heads - which God has presumed the capability of doing so - simply, clearly and straightforwardly in terms which the particular individual being addressed will immediately understand and respond to positively - you steep your messages in symbols, in metaphors. In fact, you choose to convey the most important message in the history of creation in code, as if you aspired to be Umberto Eco or Dan Brown. Anyone would think your top priority was to keep generation after generation after generation of theologians in meaningless employment, rather than communicate an urgent life-or-death message to the creatures you love more than any other.”

FFRF 2012 National Convention, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJTQiChzTNI?t=43m19s

“Eugenics was not inspired by Darwin's natural selection but by ancient agricultural ARTIFICIAL selection. Eugenics is UNnatural selection.”

https://twitter.com/richarddawkins/status/566866395540246528 (15 February 2015)
Twitter

Podobní autoři

Thomas Stearns Eliot foto
Thomas Stearns Eliot 26
anglický autor 20. století
Pelham Grenville Wodehouse foto
Pelham Grenville Wodehouse 19
anglický autor
Terry Pratchett foto
Terry Pratchett 258
anglický spisovatel
Gilbert Keith Chesterton foto
Gilbert Keith Chesterton 193
anglický romanopisec a křesťanský obhájce
John Ronald Reuel Tolkien foto
John Ronald Reuel Tolkien 85
britský filolog a spisovatel, autor Pána prstenů
Edward Abbey foto
Edward Abbey 2
americký autor a esejista
Alan Alexander Milne foto
Alan Alexander Milne 45
britský autor
John C. Maxwell foto
John C. Maxwell 35
americký autor, reproduktor a pastor
John Galsworthy foto
John Galsworthy 9
anglický romanopisec a dramatik
Jerome Klapka Jerome foto
Jerome Klapka Jerome 30
anglický humorista