Lewis Mumford citáty

Lewis Mumford foto
2  0

Lewis Mumford

Datum narození:19. říjen 1895
Datum úmrtí:26. leden 1990
Další jména:Льюїс Мамфорд

Lewis Mumford byl americký historik, sociolog, filozof a literární kritik. Byl ovlivněn pracemi Patricka Geddese o moderním městě, sám proslul nejvíce také sociologií velkoměsta, k nejslavnějším patří kniha The City in History z roku 1961, za niž získal National Book Award v kategorii literatury faktu. Definoval zde ideál tzv. organického města. Silně kritizoval rozvoj některých amerických měst, zejména vznik tzv. sídelních kaší, a chyby v urbanistickém rozvoji označil za příčinu řady sociálních problémů. Kritizoval též dehumanizační účinky moderních technologií.

Citáty Lewis Mumford

„Let us fool ourselves no longer. At the very moment Western nations, threw off the ancient regime of absolute government, operating under a once-divine king, they were restoring this same system in a far more effective form in their technology, reintroducing coercions of a military character no less strict in the organization of a factory than in that of the new drilled, uniformed, and regimented army. During the transitional stages of the last two centuries, the ultimate tendency of this system might b e in doubt, for in many areas there were strong democratic reactions; but with the knitting together of a scientific ideology, itself liberated from theological restrictions or humanistic purposes, authoritarian technics found an instrument at hand that h as now given it absolute command of physical energies of cosmic dimensions. The inventors of nuclear bombs, space rockets, and computers are the pyramid builders of our own age: psychologically inflated by a similar myth of unqualified power, boasting through their science of their increasing omnipotence, if not omniscience, moved by obsessions and compulsions no less irrational than those of earlier absolute systems: particularly the notion that the system itself must be expanded, at whatever eventual co st to life.

Through mechanization, automation, cybernetic direction, this authoritarian technics has at last successfully overcome its most serious weakness: its original dependence upon resistant, sometimes actively disobedient servomechanisms, still human enough to harbor purposes that do not always coincide with those of the system.

Like the earliest form of authoritarian technics, this new technology is marvellously dynamic and productive: its power in every form tends to increase without limits, in quantities that defy assimilation and defeat control, whether we are thinking of the output of scientific knowledge or of industrial assembly lines. To maximize energy, speed, or automation, without reference to the complex conditions that sustain organic life, have become ends in themselves. As with the earliest forms of authoritarian technics, the weight of effort, if one is to judge by national budgets, is toward absolute instruments of destruction, designed for absolutely irrational purposes whose chief by-product would be the mutilation or extermination of the human race. Even Ashurbanipal and Genghis Khan performed their gory operations under normal human limits.

The center of authority in this new system is no longer a visible personality, an all-powerful king: even in totalitarian dictatorships the center now lies in the system itself, invisible but omnipresent: all its human components, even the technical and managerial elite, even the sacred priesthood of science, who alone have access to the secret knowledge by means of which total control is now swiftly being effected, are themselves trapped by the very perfection of the organization they have invented. Like the Pharoahs of the Pyramid Age, these servants of the system identify its goods with their own kind of well-being: as with the divine king, their praise of the system is an act of self-worship; and again like the king, they are in the grip of an irrational compulsion to extend their means of control and expand the scope of their authority. In this new systems-centered collective, this Pentagon of power, there is no visible presence who issues commands: unlike job's God, the new deities cannot be confronted, still less defied. Under the pretext of saving labor, the ultimate end of this technics is to displace life, or rather, to transfer the attributes of life to the machine and the mechanical collective, allowing only so much of the organism to remain as may be controlled and manipulated.“

— Lewis Mumford

„What is more, the whole apparatus of life has become so complex and the processes of production, distribution, and consumption have become so specialized and subdivided, that the individual person loses confidence in his own unaided capacities: he is increasingly subject to commands he does not understand, at the mercy of forces over which he exercises no effective control, moving to a destination he has not chosen. Unlike the taboo-ridden savage, who is often childishly over-confident in the powers of his shaman or magician to control formidable natural forces, however inimical, the machine-conditioned individual feels lost and helpless as day by day he metaphorically punches his time-card, takes his place on the assembly line, and at the end draws a pay check that proves worthless for obtaining any of the genuine goods of life.

This lack of close personal involvement in the daily routine brings a general loss of contact with reality: instead of continuous interplay between the inner and the outer world, with constant feedback or readjustment and with stimulus to fresh creativity, only the outer world-and mainly the collectively organized outer world of the power system-exercises authority: even private dreams must be channeled through television, film, and disc, in order to become acceptable.

With this feeling of alienation goes the typical psychological problem of our time, characterized in classic terms by Erik Erikson as the 'Identity Crisis.' In a world of transitory family nurture, transitory human contacts, transitory jobs and places of residence, transitory sexual and family relations, the basic conditions for maintaining continuity and establishing personal equilibrium disappear. The individual suddenly awakens, as Tolstoi did in a famous crisis in his own life at Arzamas, to find himself in a strange, dark room, far from home, threatened by obscure hostile forces, unable to discover where he is or who he is, appalled by the prospect of a meaningless death at the end of a meaningless life.“

— Lewis Mumford
The Pentagon of Power

Dnešní výročí
Miguel ángel Asturias foto
Miguel ángel Asturias6
guatemalský básník, prozaik, dramatik, novinář a diplomat 1899 - 1974
Thomas Browne foto
Thomas Browne12
anglický učenec 1605 - 1682
Jonathan Swift foto
Jonathan Swift54
anglo-irský satirik, esejista, básník 1667 - 1745
Karel Poláček foto
Karel Poláček21
český humorista, novinář, romanopisec, scénárista a spiso... 1892 - 1944
Dalších 28 dnešních výročí
Podobní autoři
George Steiner foto
George Steiner1
americký literární kritik, esejista, beletrista, překlada...
Hippolyte Taine foto
Hippolyte Taine12
francouzský filozof, historik a literární kritik a literá...
Dmitrij Ivanovič Pisarev foto
Dmitrij Ivanovič Pisarev8
ruský novinářka
Otokar Fischer foto
Otokar Fischer3
český překladatel, dramatik, básník and kritik
Jan Blahoslav Čapek foto
Jan Blahoslav Čapek2
český komeniolog, literární historik, literární kritik, p...
Martin C. Putna foto
Martin C. Putna2
český antropolog, literární historik, profesor a vysokošk...
Charles Augustin Sainte-Beuve foto
Charles Augustin Sainte-Beuve8
francouzský literární kritik
Gilbert Keith Chesterton foto
Gilbert Keith Chesterton127
anglický romanopisec a křesťanský obhájce
Vladimír Křivánek foto
Vladimír Křivánek2
český básník, literární historik a kritik
Anatole France foto
Anatole France73
francouzský spisovatel