Martin Buber citáty
strana 2
13 citátů o moudrosti a inspiraci

Objevte hlubokou moudrost Martina Bubera prostřednictvím jeho slavných citátů. Prozkoumejte témata vzdělání, setkávání, samoty, historie, cest, autenticity a uchopitelnosti světa. Ponořte se do jeho pronikavých slov a nechte se inspirovat.

Martin Buber byl židovský filosof, překladatel a člen sionistického hnutí. Narodil se ve Vídni do židovské rodiny, kde se v mládí věnoval studiu židovských tradic. Studoval filosofii, psychologii a germanistiku ve Vídni, Lipsku, Curychu a Berlíně. Roku 1899 se připojil k sionistickému hnutí Theodora Herzla a zasazoval se o vyrovnání s palestinskými obyvateli Izraele. Buber pracoval jako redaktor židovských časopisů a také se zabýval chasidstvím.

Roku 1923 vydal své nejznámější dílo Já a Ty, které pojednává o individuálním vztahu s druhou osobou. Spolu s Franzem Rosenzweigem pracoval na novém překladu Bible. Kvůli nástupu nacismu roku 1938 odjel do Jeruzaléma, kde působil na Hebrejské univerzitě. Buber se po druhé světové válce účastnil diskusí o budoucím státu Izrael, hájil význam náboženství a spravedlivý mír mezi Židy a Palestinci. Získal mnoho ocenění za svou práci a udržoval blízké vztahy se svými přáteli v Praze. Byl také prezidentem Izraelské akademie věd a klasického vzdělávání.

✵ 8. únor 1878 – 13. červen 1965
Martin Buber: 72 citátů51 lajků

Martin Buber nejznámější citáty

„Zázrak je něco, co se stane; ale pouze tehdy, když se stane lidem, kteří jsou schopni nebo připraveni ho jako zázrak přijmout.“

Martin Buber

Zdroj: [Aveni, Anthony, 1992, Rozhovory s planetami, Tok, 1., 50, 80-86177-03-3]

Martin Buber: Citáty o vztazích

Martin Buber citáty a výroky

„Od mládí jsem našel v Ježíši svého velkého bratra.“

Martin Buber

Mimobiblické výroky o Ježíši

Martin Buber: Citáty anglicky

“When we see a great man desiring power instead of his real goal we soon recognize that he is sick, or more precisely that his attitude to his work is sick.”

Martin Buber

Zdroj: What is Man? (1938), p. 180
Kontext: When we see a great man desiring power instead of his real goal we soon recognize that he is sick, or more precisely that his attitude to his work is sick. He overreaches himself, the work denies itself to him, the incarnation of the spirit no longer takes place, and to avoid the threat of senselessness he snatches after empty power. This sickness casts the genius on to the same level as those hysterical figures who, being by nature without power, slave for power, in order that they may enjoy the illusion that they are inwardly powerful, and who in this striving for power cannot let a pause intervene, since a pause would bring with it the possibility of self-reflection and self-reflection would bring collapse.

“To win a truly great life for the people of Israel, a great peace is necessary, not a fictitious peace, the dwarfish peace that is no more than a feeble intermission, but a true peace with the neighboring peoples, which alone can render possible a common development of this portion of the earth as the vanguard of the awakening Near East.”

Martin Buber

"Our Reply" (September 1945), as published in A Land of Two Peoples : Martin Buber on Jews and Arabs (1983) edited by Paul Mendes-Flohr, p. 178
Variant translation: Only a true peace with neighboring peoples can render possible a common development of this portion of the earth as a vanguard of the awakening of the Near East.

“Through the Thou a person becomes I.”

Martin Buber kniha Já a Ty

I and Thou (1923)

“Life, in that it is life, necessarily entails justice.”

Martin Buber

"Politics and Morality" in Be'ayot (April 1945), as published in A Land of Two Peoples : Martin Buber on Jews and Arabs (1983) edited by Paul Mendes-Flohr, p. 169

“An example may clarify more precisely the relation between the psychologist and the anthropologist. If both of them investigate, say, the phenomenon of anger, the psychologist will try to grasp what the angry man feels, what his motives and the impulses of his will are, but the anthropologist will also try to grasp what he is doing. In respect of this phenomenon self-observation, being by nature disposed to weaken the spontaneity and unruliness of anger, will be especially difficult for both of them. The psychologist will try to meet this difficulty by a specific division of consciousness, which enables him to remain outside with the observing part of his being and yet let his passion run its course as undisturbed as possible. Of course this passion can then not avoid becoming similar to that of the actor, that is, though it can still be heightened in comparison with an unobserved passion its course will be different: there will be a release which is willed and which takes the place of the elemental outbreak, there will be a vehemence which will be more emphasized, more deliberate, more dramatic. The anthropologist can have nothing to do with a division of consciousness, since he has to do with the unbroken wholeness of events, and especially with the unbroken natural connection between feelings and actions; and this connection is most powerfully influenced in self-observation, since the pure spontaneity of the action is bound to suffer essentially. It remains for the anthropologist only to resign any attempt to stay outside his observing self, and thus when he is overcome by anger not to disturb it in its course by becoming a spectator of it, but to let it rage to its conclusion without trying to gain a perspective. He will be able to register in the act of recollection what he felt and did then; for him memory takes the place of psychological self-experience. … In the moment of life he has nothing else in his mind but just to live what is to be lived, he is there with his whole being, undivided, and for that very reason there grows in his thought and recollection the knowledge of human wholeness.”

Martin Buber

Varianta: An example may clarify more precisely the relation between the psychologist and the anthropologist. If both of them investigate, say, the phenomenon of anger, the psychologist will try to grasp what the angry man feels, what his motives and the impulses of his will are, but the anthropologist will also try to grasp what he is doing. In respect of this phenomenon self-observation, being by nature disposed to weaken the spontaneity and unruliness of anger, will be especially difficult for both of them. The psychologist will try to meet this difficulty by a specific division of consciousness, which enables him to remain outside with the observing part of his being and yet let his passion run its course as undisturbed as possible. Of course this passion can then not avoid becoming similar to that of the actor, that is, though it can still be heightened in comparison with an unobserved passion its course will be different: there will be a release which is willed and which takes the place of the elemental outbreak, there will be a vehemence which will be more emphasized, more deliberate, more dramatic. The anthropologist can have nothing to do with a division of consciousness, since he has to do with the unbroken wholeness of events, and especially with the unbroken natural connection between feelings and actions; and this connection is most powerfully influenced in self-observation, since the pure spontaneity of the action is bound to suffer essentially. It remains for the anthropologist only to resign any attempt to stay outside his observing self, and thus when he is overcome by anger not to disturb it in its course by becoming a spectator of it, but to let it rage to its conclusion without trying to gain a perspective. He will be able to register in the act of recollection what he felt and did then; for him memory takes the place of psychological self-experience. … In the moment of life he has nothing else in his mind but just to live what is to be lived, he is there with his whole being, undivided, and for that very reason there grows in his thought and recollection the knowledge of human wholeness.
Zdroj: What is Man? (1938), pp. 148-149

“To be old is a glorious thing when one has not unlearned what it means to begin, this old man had perhaps first learned it thoroughly in old age.”

Martin Buber

Zdroj: Eclipse of God: Studies in the Relation Between Religion and Philosophy (1952), p. 6

Podobní autoři

Hans Urs Von Balthasar foto
Hans Urs Von Balthasar4
švédský katolický teolog None
Reinhold Niebuhr foto
Reinhold Niebuhr7
americký bohoslovec None
Emil Cioran foto
Emil Cioran9
rumunský filozof a esejista None
Franz Kafka foto
Franz Kafka83
český spisovatel židovského původu None
Tomáš Halík foto
Tomáš Halík36
český filozof, psycholog, religionista, sociolog, teolog a … None
Zygmunt Bauman foto
Zygmunt Bauman8
polský filozof a sociolog None
Walter Benjamin foto
Walter Benjamin24
německý literární kritik, filozof a sociální kritik None
Anne Frank foto
Anne Frank28
židovská dívka, oběť holokaustu None
Michel Foucault foto
Michel Foucault10
francouzský filozof None
Viktor Frankl foto
Viktor Frankl32
rakouský horolezec, neurolog, psychiatr a vysokoškolský ped… None